Comments on: Agile CMMI http://www.2paths.com/2008/01/23/agile-cmmi-2/ Custom Software Technical Architecture, Design and Development in Vancouver, BC, Canada Tue, 15 Nov 2011 08:42:21 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Hillel Glazer http://www.2paths.com/2008/01/23/agile-cmmi-2/comment-page-1/#comment-139 Hillel Glazer Wed, 23 Jan 2008 21:12:11 +0000 http://blog.2paths.com/agile-cmmi.html#comment-139 I should update my comment, that the provided link would be for the benefit of your readers... who, like me, may not read thoroughly on first pass... and miss (like me) that there's more than one way to look at what they read. -->> Hillel I should update my comment, that the provided link would be for the benefit of your readers… who, like me, may not read thoroughly on first pass… and miss (like me) that there’s more than one way to look at what they read.
–>> Hillel

]]> By: Hillel Glazer http://www.2paths.com/2008/01/23/agile-cmmi-2/comment-page-1/#comment-138 Hillel Glazer Wed, 23 Jan 2008 20:51:38 +0000 http://blog.2paths.com/agile-cmmi.html#comment-138 I'm kinda surprised you didn't stumble upon AgileCMMI.com. What did you search on? “CMMI prescribes an intense process, and requires a lot of documentation in order to guarantee quality, repeatability and ongoing improvements...." incorrect... www.CMMIFAQ.info explains why (search for 'artifact') For what it's worth, David Anderson is working with me, the SEI, and others on a paper explaining how/why CMMI and Agile are *perceived* to be at odds... hopefully, once published, we'll have a follow-up paper on what to do about it. Cheers! I’m kinda surprised you didn’t stumble upon AgileCMMI.com. What did you search on?

“CMMI prescribes an intense process, and requires a lot of documentation in order to guarantee quality, repeatability and ongoing improvements….”

incorrect… http://www.CMMIFAQ.info explains why (search for ‘artifact’)

For what it’s worth, David Anderson is working with me, the SEI, and others on a paper explaining how/why CMMI and Agile are *perceived* to be at odds… hopefully, once published, we’ll have a follow-up paper on what to do about it.

Cheers!

]]>